![]() If your meeting requires minutes (legally), this is not one of those times. ![]() However, there are times when a transcript would be useful. It would not support your companies’ requirements to create minutes. Can you imagine how boring a transcript would be? And while it seems like an efficient way to create the required document that no one reads, it is not correct. The majority laugh and agree that no one reads them. ![]() Minutes should be a summary document of what will be relevant in the future (high-level discussion summary along with any decisions made).ĭuring my workshops, I jokingly ask participants if anyone ever reads the minutes they create. Everything is not relevant to the future. We do not need to know who said what (potentially dangerous for liability issues) we do not need an entire rundown of everything that was said during the meeting. Minutes are a summary of what was discussed and decided in your meeting. However, a transcription of what was said (and who said it) is not what minutes are supposed to be. Others don’t identify the speaker but do capture exactly what was said. Some of these programs even identify the speaker and precisely what they said, giving you a clear transcription of the entire meeting. Artificial intelligence is quickly gaining speed and recognition in this space, and it brings with it a host of benefits for us. They are all good at recognizing voices and creating good transcriptions of what was said. ![]() Whether it is Otter.Ai, Reason8.ai, Voicera, Rev.com, or any of the others, the temptation to use them to transcribe your meetings into minutes is irresistible. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |